Yes—in a study of over 9,000 young people, caregivers and kids rarely agreed on who stayed highly irritable. The study compared yearly reports from young people and their caregivers. It followed children from roughly ages 10 to 13. The data came from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. The findings appeared in Child Psychiatry & Human Development. Researchers looked at Irritability tied to anger as children entered their teen years. They asked whether both sides identified the same children with lasting, intense symptoms. They rarely did. This matters because tracking children's tempers has often relied on caregivers' reports. Asking young people about their own experiences gave a different picture. The supplied report does not give an exact agreement rate. It also does not show that either side was more accurate. Different reports are not proof that one person is wrong. The finding raises a useful question about whose view gets recorded. It does not explain why those views differed. For BioSocial members, the takeaway is about how we track symptoms. A personal rating and someone else's observation may tell different stories. Keeping those views separate could make community comparisons more useful. A weekly note could include your own rating and what happened that week. If someone close to you shares an observation, that adds another view—not a replacement for yours. This study focused on young people, not adults tracking their health. Still, it offers a useful reminder when comparing notes here: whose rating is it, and what period does it cover? What have you noticed when comparing your own temper ratings with how someone close to you sees them?